Hindus Granted Full Access to Bhojshala Complex by ASI
The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) has granted Hindus full access to the Bhojshala complex, a site of historical and religious significance.
30 stories found
The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) has granted Hindus full access to the Bhojshala complex, a site of historical and religious significance.

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) has granted Hindus unrestricted daily access to the disputed Bhojshala complex in Madhya Pradesh. The site will remain a protected monument under the AMASR Act 1958, with specific worship timings to be determined by the superintending archaeologist.
Digvijay Singh has criticized the High Court's Bhojshala verdict as 'vague,' asserting that an ASI protected monument should not be considered a place of worship.
The All India Muslim Personal Law Board (AIMPLB) announced it would challenge a High Court verdict on the Bhojshala complex in the Supreme Court. The High Court had allowed Hindus unrestricted access to the site.

The US Supreme Court rejected an appeal from Virginia Democrats to reinstate a congressional map that would have benefited their party. This decision upholds a lower court ruling against the proposed redistricting plan.

In a court submission, the state asserted that the Bhojshala site in Dhar was never a mosque and that Muslims have no right to offer namaz there, intensifying a long-standing dispute.

In the Bhojshala-Kamal Maula Mosque case, the High Court observed that Hindu puja and Muslim namaz do not necessarily have to take place within a temple or mosque. This statement comes amidst ongoing legal proceedings regarding the disputed religious site.

The Indian Supreme Court has stated that the Madhya Pradesh High Court will examine objections regarding the videography of the Bhojshala-Kamal Maula site.

A High Court Bench has announced it will visit the disputed Bhojshala-Kamal Maula Mosque complex before its next hearing, indicating a direct assessment of the site is deemed necessary for the ongoing legal proceedings.
A pivotal ASI report submitted to the Madhya Pradesh High Court concludes the Kamal Maula Mosque at Bhojshala was built using ancient temple parts, reigniting a decades-long dispute. The findings have energized Hindu groups demanding a Vagdevi temple, while Muslim petitioners reject the report, vowing to challenge it. The court has set March 16 for further hearings.

The Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) has granted Hindu devotees daily worshipping rights at the Bhojshala complex in Madhya Pradesh, following a High Court ruling that identified it as a Goddess Vagdevi Temple.

The first idol of Goddess Saraswati has been installed at the Bhojshala sanctum, with posters placed outside by local committees banning the entry of non-Hindus.

Devotees visited Bhojshala to perform puja following a High Court ruling that quashed a 2003 arrangement restricting Hindu worship and permitting Friday prayers for the Muslim community.

The Indore bench of the Madhya Pradesh high court ruled that the disputed Bhojshala Temple-Kamal Maula Mosque complex in Dhar district is a temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati, with similar litigations ongoing in other courts across India.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has ruled that the disputed Bhojshala complex in Dhar is a temple of Goddess Vagdevi (Saraswati) and affirmed the right of Hindus to worship there. This verdict has drawn reactions from both Hindu and Muslim sides, with some noting similarities to the Babri Masjid judgment.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has reserved its order in the contentious Bhojshala case, which involves a dispute over the religious status of the site with claims from Hindu, Muslim, and Jain communities.

The Madhya Pradesh High Court has commenced hearings in the long-standing Bhojshala-Kamal Maula Mosque dispute, a contentious issue involving religious sites.

The court has granted two weeks time to the government authorities to file their objections after they raised questions at the maintainability of the plea as a public interest litigation (PIL).

The Indore Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court on Monday heard the long-pending matter concerning the disputed Bhojshala Kamal Maula complex in Dhar.

An Indian Express quiz challenges readers on topics like Gandhi, Bhojshala, and historical inscriptions, relevant for civil services preliminary exams.
A fire broke out on the Delhi-Thiruvananthapuram Rajdhani Express in Madhya Pradesh, leading to the evacuation and rescue of all passengers. A relief vehicle rushing to the scene later flipped into a gorge.

An Indian court, declaring the Bhojshala complex a temple dedicated to Goddess Saraswati, has urged the government to take formal steps to bring back the historic Saraswati idol currently housed in the British Museum.
The Madhya Pradesh High Court declared the Bhojshala complex in Dhar a temple, asserting that the 1991 Places of Worship Act does not apply to the site. This verdict, which saw devotees offering prayers, also suggested the possibility of an alternative land for Muslims.

The Madhya Pradesh High Court delivered its Bhojshala verdict, dismissing claims that Jainism is a branch of Hinduism and other assertions regarding the disputed area.
A Hindu organization informed the Madhya Pradesh High Court that an Archaeological Survey of India (ASI) report supports their claim that a temple predated a mosque at the Bhojshala complex.


The Indore Bench of the Madhya Pradesh High Court will visit the disputed Bhojshala-Kamal Maula complex before its next hearing on April 2. Hindus are allowed to worship every Tuesday, while Muslims are permitted to offer namaz every Friday, as per a 2003 ASI order.
The Bhojshala complex in Dhar, simultaneously known as a temple and mosque, remains a site of intense communal dispute.
An Archaeological Survey of India report, submitted to the MP High Court, concludes the Kamal Maula Mosque at Bhojshala was built using parts of ancient temples. Scientific investigations reveal the structure, dating back to the Paramara dynasty, incorporates dismantled temple remains. The court has directed parties to file objections on the findings.