Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump's Sweeping Tariffs
The Supreme Court has issued a ruling striking down some of former President Trump's most extensive tariffs, leading to immediate reactions and fallout.
The Story
Analyzing sources…
Source Diversity
Source Diversity
Excellent (100/100)Sources
Tariffs ruling is major blow to Trump's second-term agenda
The Supreme Court has weakened Trump's hand in dealing with other nations, writes Anthony Zurcher.
Read full article →The Supreme Court’s Declaration of Independence
The court’s rejection of President Trump’s tariffs program is the latest in a series of clashes between him and Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr.
By Adam Liptak
Read full article →Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs - The Wall Street Journal
Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump’s Global Tariffs The Wall Street Journal
Read full article →The Supreme Court has delivered an overdue rebuke to Donald Trump on tariffs
It turns out that even conservative justices will only accept so many assaults on legal and constitutional norms
Read full article →What the Supreme Court throwing out Trump’s tariffs means for you
The decision may not lead to immediate price drops for consumers, despite the potential for refunds and changes to trade policies.
By Rachel Lerman
Read full article →Democrats revel in supreme court decision curbing Trump’s tariff spree
Schumer says ‘overreach failed’ after court rules president cannot bypass Congress’s power to tax US politics – follow live Democratic lawmakers are rejoicing after the supreme court ruled that Donald Trump overstepped his authority by imposing steep tariffs on global imports, toppling one of the president’s most aggressive assertions of executive power. The 6-3 ruling found that a 1977 emergency powers law did not provide legal justification for most of the administration’s sweeping tariffs, a ruling the Senate minority leader, Chuck Schumer, framed as a win for “American consumers” and an example of how Trump’s “overreach failed”. Continue reading...
By Joseph Gedeon in Washington
Read full article →Trump's tariffs were 'last straw' for this business owner's now-shuttered store
NPR's Michel Martin speaks with Jennifer Bergman, who says she had to close her family's toy store business of 44 years in July 2025 due to President Trump's tariffs.
By Michel Martin
Read full article →‘Tariffs suck’: Some Republicans privately celebrate as Supreme Court blocks Trump policy
Some Republicans quietly celebrate the Supreme Court’s decision blocking most of President Trump’s tariffs, calling it a win for Congress’ authority.
Read full article →Trump tariffs live: US Supreme Court rules against sweeping global tariffs
Supreme Court says Trump did not have authority to enact tariffs under law meant for national emergencies.
Read full article →Watch: Trump to speak after Supreme Court strikes down tariffs
The Supreme Court ruling is a major blow to Trump, whose economic and foreign policies leaned on his asserted power to unilaterally slap tariffs on any country.
Read full article →US Supreme Court strikes down Trump's tariffs. Now what?
In a much-anticipated decision, the US Supreme Court has ruled that most of the president's tariffs are unconstitutional because of how he implemented them. But the administration is prepared to reinstate them.
Read full article →US Supreme Court strikes down Donald Trump’s sweeping tariffs
Kethevane Gorjestani has more.
By FRANCE24
Read full article →Will the U.S. give tariff refunds after the Supreme Court decision? What we know so far.
The Supreme Court’s decision striking down most of President Donald Trump’s tariffs left at least one big question unanswered: What about refunds?
By Robert Schroeder
Read full article →US Supreme Court strikes down most of Trump’s tariffs
The court’s 6-3 ruling, a rare blow to the president from its conservative majority, leaves Washington’s economic policy up in the air
By Jesús-Sérvulo González Moreno
Read full article →Why SCOTUS' rejection of Biden's student-loan forgiveness plays a big role in its Trump tariff decision
The Supreme Court's decision overturning President Donald Trump's tariffs partly relies on its earlier ruling that struck down broad student-loan forgiveness. Al Drago/Bloomberg The Supreme Court overturned most of Trump's tariffs. The justices cited the court's 2023 decision that struck down Biden's broad student-loan forgiveness. They said that both broad student-debt relief and Trump's sweeping tariffs were beyond the scope of the law. What do broad student-loan forgiveness and tariffs have in common? More than you might think, according to the nation's highest court. On Friday, the Supreme Court struck down most of President Donald Trump's tariffs, ruling that he lacked the authority to enact his expansive tariff policies under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act. While IEEPA allows the president to regulate economic activity during emergencies, the Supreme Court said that Trump's tariffs went beyond the law's threshold. If that argument sounds familiar, it's because it's the same one the Supreme Court made in 2023 when it struck down former President Joe Biden's broad student-loan forgiveness plan. As Justice Neil Gorsuch wrote in his concurring opinion on Friday, the court requires "clear congressional authorization" to carry out broad economic policies like student-loan forgiveness or tariffs. Chief Justice John Roberts echoed that in his tariff opinion, writing that in Biden v. Nebraska, the student-debt ruling, the court "declined to read authorization to 'waive or modify' statutory or regulatory provisions applicable to financial assistance programs as a delegation of power to cancel $430 billion in student loan debt." Roberts referred to the major questions doctrine, which requires federal agencies to have clear, congressional authorization — not ambiguous legal language — before enacting broad economic policies. He said that while Trump's administration said that the doctrine should not apply in the tariff case, that "argument is nearly identical to one it already advanced" in the student-debt case. "There, the Government contended that a different emergency statute should be interpreted broadly because its 'whole point' was to provide 'substantial discretion to . . . respond to unforeseen emergencies,'" Roberts wrote. "We rejected that argument in Nebraska, and we reject it here as well." Biden's student-loan forgiveness plan would have canceled up to $20,000 in debt for federal borrowers. Biden's administration was using the HEROES Act of 2003 to attempt to enact the relief, which gave the education secretary the ability to waive or modify student-loan balances in connection with a national emergency, like the pandemic. Just as it did in the tariff decision, the Supreme Court ruled at the time that the relief went beyond the law. Trump has not yet commented on the Supreme Court's ruling, and it does not affect the tariffs the president has imposed under laws other than IEEPA. Read the original article on Business Insider
Read full article →John Roberts’ Rebuke of Trump’s Tariffs Is Withering, Confident, and Genuinely Encouraging
Read full article →US Supreme Court ruling: Trump's tariffs that remain unaffected
By TOI BUSINESS DESK
Read full article →US Supreme Court strikes down Trump tariffs, clouding Korea trade deal
The US Supreme Court ruled Friday that President Donald Trump’s sweeping “reciprocal tariffs” imposed on nearly all trading partners, including South Korea, were unlawful, injecting fresh uncertainty into global trade and existing agreements tied to the duties. In a 6-3 decision, the high court ruled that the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, which Trump used to justify the tariffs, does not grant the president authority to impose such measures, upholding earlier decisions by lower co
By The Korea Herald
Read full article →Trump tariffs struck down—now comes the refund question
Read full article →Tajani says doesn't think there will be any major changes on tariffs
(ANSA) - ROME, FEB 20 - Foreign Minister Antonio Tajani said Friday he didn't think there would be any major changes on tariffs after the United States Supreme Court ruled that President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs were illegal. "It's always good news when tariffs are removed, but I don't think there will be any major changes," said Tajani,. who is also deputy premier, to journalists in Forlì who were asking for a comment on the US Supreme Court's rejection of the tariffs imposed by the Trump administration. "There are temporary measures that the Americans can adopt, and they were already expecting this decision, so I don't think there will be any major changes. I don't think there will be any significant impact on our exports," he added. (ANSA). Read article...
By ANSA
Read full article →Trump calls Supreme Court tariff ruling a disgrace, say sources - The Daily Star
Trump calls Supreme Court tariff ruling a disgrace, say sources The Daily Star
Read full article →Trump’s Global Tariffs Struck Down by US Supreme Court
The US Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s sweeping global tariffs, undercutting his signature economic policy and delivering his biggest legal defeat since he returned to the White House.
By Greg Stohr
Read full article →Coverage Timeline
Related Stories
Zaanstad Attempts to Dismantle Criminal Window Cleaning Empire
just now

Bacolod Court Declares Four Yanson Siblings as 'Fugitives from Justice'
just now

Philippine House Panel Summons Ombudsman for Sara Duterte Impeachment Hearing
just now

Philippine VP Sara Duterte Seeks Supreme Court Intervention to Halt Impeachment
just now