Starmer's War with Big Tech: Proposal to Ban Social Media for Under-16s

Keir Starmer's proposal to ban social media for under-16s is framed as a 'war with Big Tech,' potentially uniting his party and the country on online safety.

15 Feb, 22:30 — 16 Feb, 10:52

Moderate (27/100)

2 sourcesNarrow spread1 region

Post Share

Why this matters

This story is significant as it addresses growing concerns about the impact of social media on young people's mental health and development. A ban would represent a major policy shift with profound implications for children, parents, and the business models of major technology companies. It also highlights the ongoing debate about governmental regulation of digital platforms.

ℹAll sources from UK region

ℹOnly 2 sources cover this story

Perspective Analysis

AI-generated comparison of how 2 sources cover this story

Both outlets report on Starmer's proposal to ban social media for under-16s, confirming the core policy idea. However, their coverage diverges, with one focusing on the political opportunities for Starmer and the other emphasizing the potential timeline for the ban's implementation.

Coverage matrix

	times-uk	New Statesman
The political implications of the ban for Starmer, including uniting his party and the country.
The potential timeline for the ban's implementation, specifically that it 'could be in force this year'.

Covered Divergent Not mentioned

What sources agree on

Keir Starmer has proposed a ban on social media for individuals under 16 years old.

Where they diverge

The primary focus or implication of the proposed social media ban.

New Statesman

This outlet frames the ban as a political opportunity for Starmer to unite his party and the country.

times-uk

This outlet focuses on the potential timeline, suggesting the ban could be implemented within the current year.

Key claims1 agreed · 2 unverified

✓

Starmer proposes banning social media for under-16s.

agreed·New Statesmantimes-uk

The social media ban for under-16s could be in force this year.

unverified·times-uk

Banning social media for under-16s gives the Prime Minister a chance to unite his party and the country.

unverified·New Statesman

Coverage gaps

The political implications of the ban for Starmer, including uniting his party and the country.

ReportedNew Statesman

Missingtimes-uk

The potential timeline for the ban's implementation, specifically that it 'could be in force this year'.

Reportedtimes-uk

MissingNew Statesman

Perspective Analysis

Comparing sources…

External Fact-Checks

Claims matched against human-vetted fact-check databases

✗False. The ban has not been delayed.

The government has announced its under-16 social media ban has been delayed.

AAP·4 Dec 2025Read →

—Misleading: The government is regulating porn sites under separate internet safety codes.

Pornhub is exempt from Australia's social media ban.

AAP·12 Feb 2026Read →

Story evolution

The narrative shifted from initial reporting on the practical timeline of the proposed ban to a more analytical focus on its political implications and strategic value for the Prime Minister.

Initial Reporting on Potential TimelineFeb 15 evening

The Times reports on the possibility of the social media ban for under-16s being implemented within the current year.

Analysis of Political ImplicationsFeb 16 morning

The New Statesman provides an analytical perspective, focusing on the political strategy and potential for Starmer to unite his party and the country through this policy.