
US Supreme Court Voting Rights Act Ruling Draws Criticism
The US Supreme Court issued a ruling concerning the Voting Rights Act, which drew strong criticism from civil rights groups and political figures who called it a 'devastating blow' to democracy. The decision sparked debate over the reality of racism and its impact on voting rights.
The Story
Analyzing sources…
Source Diversity
Source Diversity
Excellent (87/100)Sources
Behind Supreme Court Voting Rights Ruling, a Clash Over the Reality of Racism
The Supreme Court ruling said there must be proof that a racial group was “intentionally” disadvantaged. The dissent called it “well-nigh impossible.”
By Richard Fausset
Read full article →He spent 60 years building Black political power. He sees a wipeout coming.
Press Robinson, who years ago mounted a legal fight to become the first Black person elected to a Louisiana school board, was on the losing side of the Supreme Court case weakening the Voting Rights Act.
By Justin Jouvenal
Read full article →The supreme court trusts America not to be racist. I don’t | Jamil Smith
The Callais decision is predicated on the idea that American leaders will act justly on their own. That premise has already been proven hollow Six supreme court justices handed down a ruling built, ostensibly, on the belief that the US has changed so much as to render the protections of the Voting Rights Act unnecessary. No one should be that gullible. In 1901, the same year my great-grandfather was born, George H White rose to address the 56th United States Congress for the last time. He was...
By Jamil Smith
Read full article →Civil rights groups in the South respond to Supreme Court's blow to voting rights
We gauge reaction in the Deep South to the Supreme Court ruling that could upend Black representation in Congress.
By Debbie Elliott
Read full article →Warnock: Supreme Court dealt 'devastating blow' to democracy with Voting Rights Act ruling
Read full article →Contempt Of Court: Hakeem Jeffries Denounces the Supreme Court As "Illegitimate"
Contempt Of Court: Hakeem Jeffries Denounces the Supreme Court As "Illegitimate" Authored by Jonathan Turley, The Supreme Court’s decision in Louisiana v. Callais took 36 pages to explain why Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act is about combating intentional racial discrimination, not allowing racial gerrymandering. However, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries wrapped it up in one word: “illegitimate.” Jeffries was not speaking of the case, but the Court. The man who would b...
By Tyler Durden
Read full article →Defection: Peter Obi was left with no choice but to defect – DG Heritage Centre
A foundation leader of the Obidient Movement and Director-General of the Heritage Centre, Dr. Katch Onanuju, has said the 2023 Labour Party presidential candidate, Peter Obi, had no option but to pursue his political future elsewhere following developments within the African Democratic Congress (ADC). The post Defection: Peter Obi was left with no choice but to defect – DG Heritage Centre appeared first on Vanguard News.
By Nwafor
Read full article →Coverage Timeline
Related Stories

Trump Considers Military Action Against Iran Amid Hormuz Blockade Discussions; UK Declines to Join
just now

Prosecutor Disputes Sara Duterte Counsel's Claims on Pretrial Attendance
just now

Cebu Vice Mayor Charged Over Unauthorized Bonus and Hiring Wife
just now

NBI Investigates Tacloban School Shooting, Linked to Bullying
just now